|
FDA
Announces Results of
Investigation Into Illegal
Promotion of OxyContin by
The Purdue Frederick
Company, Inc.
Company
Misrepresented Prescription
Pain Reliever to Health Care
Professionals
|
May 10,
2007 and
revised
May 14,
07
"The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration's (FDA) Office of
Criminal Investigations (OCI)
announced today that The Purdue
Frederick Company, Inc. has agreed
to pay more than $600 million to
resolve criminal charges and civil
liabilities in connection with a
long-term illegal scheme to promote,
market and sell OxyContin, a
powerful prescription pain reliever
that the company produces.
An
investigation by OCI uncovered an
extensive, long-term scheme by The
Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. to
generate the maximum amount of
revenues possible from the sale of
OxyContin. To further this goal,
Purdue trained its sales
representatives to make false
representations to health care
providers about the difficulty of
extracting oxycodone, the active
ingredient, from the OxyContin
tablet; trained its sales force to
represent to health care providers
that OxyContin did not cause
euphoria and was less addictive than
immediate-release opiates; and
allowed health care providers to
entertain the erroneous belief that
OxyContin was less addictive than
morphine. In addition, Purdue
falsely labeled OxyContin as
providing "fewer peaks and valleys
than with immediate-release
oxycodone," and falsely represented
that patients taking lower dosages
of the drug can always be
discontinued abruptly without
suffering withdrawal symptoms or
tolerance.
"FDA will not
tolerate practices that falsely
promote drug products and place
consumers at health risk," said
Margaret O.K. Glavin, Associate
Commissioner for Regulatory Affairs.
"We will continue to do all we can
to protect the public against drug
companies and their representatives
who are not truthful and bilk
consumers of precious health care dollars."
To
resolve the criminal charges, Purdue
pled guilty to a felony count of
misbranding a drug with intent to
defraud and mislead. As part of the
plea, Purdue will pay a $600 million
settlement. That amount includes a
criminal fine, restitution to
government agencies, over $276
million in forfeiture, and a related
civil settlement under which Purdue
will pay $100.6 million to the
United States.
This case was prosecuted by the
U. S. Attorney's Office for the
Western District of Virginia and
investigated by FDA's Office of
Criminal Investigations; the
Internal Revenue Service's Criminal
Investigations Division; the U.S.
Department of Health and Human
Services' Office of Inspector
General; and the State Police
Departments of Virginia and West
Virginia. This case serves as an
excellent example of federal and
state law enforcement cooperation."
Source: The F.D.A.
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/
2007/NEW01632.html |
FDA Issues Health Risk Alert
for 'True Man' and 'Energy
Max' Products
|
"The
Food and
Drug
Administration
(FDA) is
advising
consumers
not to
purchase
or use
"True
Man" or
"Energy
Max"
products
promoted
and sold
as
dietary
supplements
throughout
the
United
States.
Both
products
--
touted
as
sexual
enhancement
products
and as
treatments
for
erectile
dysfunction
(ED) --
are
illegal
drug
products
that
contain
potentially
harmful,
undeclared
ingredients.
The
products
contain
substances
called
analogs
that
have
similar
structures
to
active
ingredients
in
approved
prescription
drugs.
Consumers should discontinue use
of True Man and Energy Max and consult their health care
professional about approved treatments for ED. FDA encourages men
who experience ED to seek guidance from a health care professional.
FDA has not approved True Man and
Energy Max; therefore the safety and effectiveness of these products
are unknown. Both products are often advertised as "all natural"
alternatives to approved ED drugs in advertisements appearing in
newspapers, retail stores,
and on the Internet.
"These products threaten the
health of the people using them because they contain undeclared
chemicals that are similar to the active ingredients used in
FDA-approved prescription drug products," said Steven Galson, M.D.,
MPH, director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research."
The risk is even more serious because consumers may not know that
these ingredients can interact with medications and dangerously
lower their blood pressure."
The undeclared analog ingredients
in True Man and Energy Max may interact with nitrates found in some
prescription drugs such as nitroglycerin and may lower blood
pressure to dangerous levels. Men with diabetes, high blood
pressure, high cholesterol or heart disease often take nitrates.
FDA chemical analysis revealed
that Energy Max contains thione analog of sildenafil, a substance
with a structure similar to sildenafil, the active ingredient in
Viagra, an FDA-approved drug for ED.Substances like this are called
analogs because they have a structure similar to another drug and
may cause similar side effects and drug interactions.
True Man contains a thione analog
of sildenafil or piperadino vardenafil, an analog of vardenafil, the
active ingredient in Levitra, another FDA-approved prescription drug
for ED. Neither the thione analog of sildenafil nor piperadino
vardenafil are components of approved drug products.
True Man is sold in boxes
containing a 10-capsule blister pack. Energy Max is sold in boxes
containing two 10-capsule blister packs. Both products are
distributed and packed by America True Man Health, Inc., West
Covina, Calif. A review of the ingredient statements for both
products revealed that neither piperadino vardenafil nor thione
analog of sildenafil are listed as an ingredient, even though one or
more of those ingredients is present in the products."
Source: The FDA
http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/
NEWS/2007/NEW01633.html |
One In 4 Hospital Patients
Is Admitted With a
Mental Health or Substance Abuse Disorder
|
April
2007
"Almost
one-fourth
of all
stays in
the U.S.
community
hospitals
for
patients
age 18
and
older -
7.6
million
of
nearly
32
million
stays -
involved
depressive,
bipolar,
schizophrenia,
and
other
mental
health
disorders
or
substance
use
related
disorders
in 2004,
according
to a new
report
by the
Agency
for
Healthcare
Research
and
Quality.
This
study
presents
the
first
documentation
of the
full
impact
of
mental
health
and
substance
abuse
disorders
on U.S.
community
hospitals.
According
to the
report,
about
1.9
million
of the
7.6
million
stays
were for
patients
who were
hospitalized
primarily
because
of a
mental
health
or
substance
abuse
problem.
In the
other
5.7
million
stays,
patients
were
admitted
for
another
condition
but they
also
were
diagnosed
as
having a
mental
health
or
substance
abuse
disorder.
Nearly 2/3 of costs were
billed to the government: Medicare covered nearly half
of the stays, and 18% were billed to Medicaid. Roughly
8% of the patients were uninsured. Private insurers
were billed for the balance. The study also found that
one of every three stays of uninsured patients was related
to a mental health or substance abuse disorder.
AHRQ found that most
patients with mental health and substance abuse disorders
were older. For example, although people age 80 and
older comprised only 5% of the US population in 2004, they
accounted for nearly 21% of all hospital stays for these
conditions- principally for dementia. The most
frequent admitting diagnosis for women was mood disorders,
while that for men was substance abuse.
The report also indicates
that patients who have been diagnosed with both a mental
health condition and a substance abuse disorder - those with
"dual diagnoses" - accounted for 1 million of the nearly 8
million stays. Nearly half of these cases with dual
diagnoses involved drug abuse.
Suicide attempts accounted
for nearly 179,000 hospital stays. Of these, 93%
involved a mental health condition - most commonly mood
disorders - and/or substance abuse. Poisoning, by
overdosing prescription medicines or ingesting a toxic
substance was the most common way patients attempted
suicide."
Source: U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for
Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). No. 320, April
2007
|
If you have an area of
interest or comments,
please call or email:
|
|